(r5) MoragWilliamsMSciProjectWiki < LinearCollider

LinearCollider Web>MoragWilliamsMSciProjectWiki (revision 5) (raw view)~~EditAttach~~

---+ Morag Williams: MSci Project Wiki

*Project Title: Sensitivity to beyond Standard Model physics through Higgs production at CLIC using effective field theories. Supervisor: Aidan Robson.*

*In Progress.*
---++ MADGRAPH Generating Steps

All using MADGRAPH 2.4.3, which requires Python 2.6 or 2.7. Using the Higgs Effective Lagrangian (HEL) Universal FeynRules Output (UFO) model which can be found here: https://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/HEL.

1) Start MADGRAPH:

=cd MG5_aMC_v2_4_3/bin/=

=./mg5_aMC=

This opens the MADGRAPH5_ aMC @ NLO interface.

2) Import the HEL_UFO model (which needs to have been copied to your models directory):

=import model HEL_UFO=

3) Generate electron + positron -&gt; Higgs + electron + positron events, with a new physics parameter and QED type stated.

<span> =generate e+ e- &gt; h e+ e- QED=4 NP=1= </span>

<span>^^ Note: the order of e+ and e- here defines the incoming beam directions; do this ordering for a +ve positron pseudorapidity.<br /></span>

4) Write to output directory of name ee_hee2

=output ee_hee2=

=quit=

5) Travel to the new directory /bin/ee_hee2 and change the run card parameters as needed in file Cards/run_card.dat.

6) Start the MadEvent interface and generate events with the run card parameters specified in run_card.dat.

=cd /ee_hee2/bin/=

=./madevent=

=generate_events=

This will open a web page showing the generation progress and main parameters (such as the particle interaction and beam energies), and create an output file unweighted_events.lhe.gz in Events/run_01. A file run_01_tag_1_banner.txt is also created in /Events/run_01 listing all commands used in the MADGRAPH and MadEvent interfaces and all run card parameters used.

---++ ETA Graphs for different EFT parameters

The c coefficient values for the SM case are 0.

Graph of the positron pseudorapidity for SM c coefficient values. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.028427 pb (to 6 significant figures).

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_ep_SM.pdf][pseudorap_ep_SM.pdf]]

Graph of the electron pseudorapidity for SM c coefficient values. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.028427 pb (to 6 significant figures).

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_SM.pdf][pseudorap_SM.pdf]]

Graph of the positron pseudorapidity for three values of cHW: 0.1, 0.075, and 0.05. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.092673, 0.060957, 0.039631 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0.

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW.pdf][pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW.pdf]]

Graph of the electron pseudorapidity for three values of cHW: 0.1, 0.075, and 0.05. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.092673, 0.060957, 0.039631 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0.

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW.pdf][pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW.pdf]]

Graph of the positron pseudorapidity for three values of cWW: 0.1, 0.075, and 0.05. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.110403, 0.070788, 0.044749 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0.

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cWW.pdf][pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cWW.pdf]]

Graph of the electron pseudorapidity for three values of cWW: 0.1, 0.075, and 0.05. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.110403, 0.070788, 0.044749 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0.

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cWW.pdf][pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cWW.pdf]]

Graph of the positron pseudorapidity for two values of cWW and cHW: both at 0.1, and both at 0.05. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.354658, 0.097377 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0.

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf][pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf]]

Graph of the electron pseudorapidity for two values of cWW and cHW: both at 0.1, and both at 0.05. 100,000 events were used and the cross sections were 0.354658, 0.097377 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0.

[[%ATTACHURLPATH%/pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf][pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf]]

-- %USERSIG{MoragWilliams - 2016-11-07}%
---++ Comments

%COMMENT%

Attachments

Topic attachments
I	Attachment	History	Action	Size	Date	Who	Comment
pdf	pseudorap_SM.pdf	r1	manage	14.0 K	2016-11-18 - 16:05	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_em_SM.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW.pdf	r1	manage	15.7 K	2016-11-18 - 16:02	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf	r1	manage	15.0 K	2016-11-18 - 16:03	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cWW.pdf	r1	manage	15.6 K	2016-11-18 - 16:02	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_em_comparison_0_cWW.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_em_comparisoncHW_0.05_0.1.pdf	r1	manage	14.5 K	2016-11-14 - 14:45	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_em_comparisoncHW_0.05_0.1.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_em_comparisoncWW_0.05_0.1_0.075.pdf	r1	manage	14.9 K	2016-11-14 - 14:33	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_em_comparisoncWW_0.05_0.1_0.075.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_ep_SM.pdf	r1	manage	14.0 K	2016-11-18 - 16:04	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_ep_SM.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW.pdf	r1	manage	15.7 K	2016-11-18 - 16:03	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf	r1	manage	15.0 K	2016-11-18 - 16:04	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cHW_cWW.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cWW.pdf	r1	manage	15.7 K	2016-11-18 - 16:03	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_ep_comparison_0_cWW.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_ep_comparisoncHW_0.05_0.1.pdf	r1	manage	14.3 K	2016-11-14 - 14:45	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_ep_comparisoncHW_0.05_0.1.pdf
pdf	pseudorap_ep_comparisoncWW_0.05_0.1_0.075.pdf	r1	manage	15.0 K	2016-11-14 - 14:33	MoragWilliams	pseudorap_ep_comparisoncWW_0.05_0.1_0.075.pdf

Topic revision: r5 - 2016-11-18 - MoragWilliams

LinearCollider