Line: 1 to 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Morag Williams: MSci Project Wiki | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Line: 47 to 47 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ETA Graphs for different EFT parameters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < | The effect of varying different Higgs c coupling values has been investigated. I varied cHW, cWW, and then both simultaneously. The c coefficient values for the SM case are 0. For each comparison there are 3 plots: there is the original unscaled histogram of the pseudorapidity; one scaled to make the y axis d(simga)/d(eta) by using a factor of (crosssection) / (integral under the SM histogram) on the original histogram; and then one scaled to make the y axis 1/sigma d(simga)/d(eta) by using a factor of 1 / (integral under the SM histogram) on the original histogram. 100,00 events were generated for each coupling value. The Standard Model line on each comparison plot had a cross section of 0.028427 pb (to 6 significant figures) and had 99797 entries from the original 100,000 generated. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > | The effect of varying different Higgs c coupling coefficient values has been investigated. I varied cHW, cWW, and then both simultaneously. The c coefficient values for the SM case are 0. For each comparison there are 3 plots: there is the original unscaled histogram of the pseudorapidity; one scaled to make the y axis d(simga)/d(eta) by using a factor of (crosssection) / (integral under the histogram) on the original histogram; and then one scaled to make the y axis 1/sigma d(simga)/d(eta) by using a factor of 1 / (integral under the histogram) on the original histogram. 100,000 events were generated for each coupling value. The Standard Model line on each comparison plot had a cross section of 0.028427 pb (to 6 significant figures) and had 99797 entries from the original 100,000 generated. Graphs of the electron pseudorapidity for the SM case. etacomparison_unscaled_SM_em.pdf: etacomparison_unscaled_SM_em.pdf etacomparison_scaled_SM_em.pdf: etacomparison_scaled_SM_em.pdf etacomparison_scaledsigma_SM_em.pdf: etacomparison_scaledsigma_SM_em.pdf | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Graphs of the electron pseudorapidity for three values of cHW: 0.1, 0.075, and 0.05. The cross sections were 0.092673, 0.060957, 0.039631 pb respectively (to 6 decimal places). All other coefficients were set at 0. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Line: 78 to 86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changed: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
< < |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
> > |
|