Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B2hh GFact Asymmetry Fitting pageThe aims for the asymmetry fitter are the following | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < |
| |||||||
> > |
| |||||||
| ||||||||
Line: 18 to 18 | ||||||||
2. Bs → K K50 datasets were generated with 6099 events per data set using 0.68 bs2KK (sf3=1 and ssb = 0.68) and 0.32 combinatoric background ( mass distribution ). The asymmetry fitter was used to fit for Bs asymmetries only with sf3'=0.68 and obtained the following Adir for Bd and Amix for Bs which in numbers are:Adir Bs - input was 0.1 and fitted was 0.0811 ± 0.0275 Amix Bs - input was 0.25 and fitted was 0.1799 ± 0.0346 | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
Ran a job with 100 data sets with 6000 events per data set using 0.664 Bs2KK and 0.336 combinatoric background.
Adir Bs - input was 0.1 and fitted was 0.06436 ± 0.00630 ( AdirBs) Amix Bs - input was 0.25 and fitted was 0.1721 ± 0.0076 ( AmixBs) Now ran the same job as above but removed the Gaussian smearing of the proper time in the toy data generation and re-ran the job and got the exact same asymmetries and uncertainties. This should make a difference surely? Still looking in to it. | |||||||
3. Bd → π π and Bd → K π50 data sets were generated with 6099 events per data set using 0.68 bd2pipi and bd2Kpi (sf1=sf2=0.5 and ssb = 0.68) and 0.32 combinatoric background ( mass distribution ).The asymmetry fitter was used to fit for Bd asymmetries only with sf1'=sf2'=0.34 and obtained the following Adir for Bd and Amix for Bd which in numbers are:Adir Bd - input was 0.38 and fitted was 0.298 ± 0.206 Amix Bd - input was 0.61 and fitted was 0.660 ± 0.062 | ||||||||
Line: 28 to 34 | ||||||||
Amix Bd - input was 0.61 and fitted was 0.6811 ± 0.0019 ( AmixBd) and Laurence got 0.655 ± 0.024 | ||||||||
Changed: | ||||||||
< < | The asymmetry plot is shown here . However the pull plots are still showing a large bias in the mean of the pull plot (the widths are approximately ok). What's causing the bias in the pull plots? It is not present in the first case when on ly B2pipi and combinatoric background are used....looking in to this now. | |||||||
> > | The asymmetry plot is shown here . However the pull plots are still showing a large bias in the mean of the pull plot (the widths are approximately ok). What's causing the bias in the pull plots? It is not present in the first case when only B2pipi and combinatoric background are used....looking in to this now. Interesteingly, in an earlier version of Laurence's thesis he has numbers like mine then they suddenly got really good. Waiting to hear back from him to see if he can remember what he changed. | |||||||
4. Bd → π π, Bd → K π and Bs → K K50 datasets were generated with 6099 events per data set using all 3 channels with sf1=sf2=sf3=0.333 and ssb = 0.68) and 0.32 combinatoric background ( mass distribution ). The asymmetry fitter was used to fit for Bd asymmetries only with sf1'=sf2'=sf3'=0.226 and obtained the following Adir for Bd and Amix for Bd which in numbers are:Adir Bd - input was 0.38 and fitted was 0.4917 ± 0.0638 Amix Bd - input was 0.61 and fitted was 0.6852 ± 0.0456 Then re-ran the asymmetry fitter for the Bs asymmetries and found; Adir Bs - input was 0.1 and fitted was 0.0416 ± 0.0606 ( AdirBs) Amix Bs - input was 0.25 and fitted was 0.1505 ± 0.0598( AmixBs) | ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > | 5. Full toy data sample | |||||||
-- AlisonBates - 2010-08-06 | ||||||||
Line: 60 to 67 | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Added: | ||||||||
> > |
|