Difference: ReadingLepFlaVio (6 vs. 7)
Revision 72012-02-17 - SarahAllwood
| Line: 1 to 1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Line: 84 to 84 | ||||||||
|
o p1 line 6: I thought LPV is a general feature of GUT models, an even more convincing extension. Not sure how to get a ref. o p1 line 33: Why is the top squark taken to be the lightest up type squark? Is it because limits are set lowest? I assume b squark is more massvive. So I agree with James on this. o line 35, page 3: Standard ATLAS tools needs a ref or description. o Fig 2: dont understand the "total background". Signal hard to see at all on dphi and nJet plot. The preselection tells one that the top is understood but the final selection has no top visible. The issue is to ensure tha tthe kinmatic distribution of diboson is correct. Also, the instrumental suffers low statistics and the tails could be an issue. It does not seem these plots are of any use in the final analysis. o Fig 3: seems that in the end this is just a counting experiment and it is hard to see where the kinematic cuts help. | ||||||||
| Added: | ||||||||
| > > | Sarah Allwood-Spiers' comments Agree with others that a reference is needed for 0.72 and 0.28 pdfs, and that "using standard ATLAS tools" instead needs a description or a reference. Few minor comments: p1, line 46 pluralised \lambda's could be confusing - would \lambda' indices be better? p1, line 63 This sentence could be moved to line 51 - in its current position it reads as though the number of variables the cross section is dependent on has been simplified by ignoring s\dbar and d\sbar, but these are also only dependent on \lambda'_231 and \lambda'_132. Or change the sentence to have |\lambda'_131\lambda'_231| , |\lambda'_132\lambda'_232| and m_t~ as the three variables. p2, line 30 "and with et>25Gev and to lie inside..." sentence too long, I think "and to lie" doesn't make sense. Perhaps "...reconstructed in the ID. They are required to have Et>25GeV and to lie inside..." p3, line 34: "and were calculated" -> "were calculated" 4, line 33,: should reference 13 be a footnote instead? | |||||||
| -- DeepakKar - 2012-02-14 -- AdrianBuzatu - 2012-02-15 \ No newline at end of file | ||||||||
View topic | History: r9 < r8 < r7 < r6 | More topic actions...
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors. Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback