Difference: ReadingLepFlaVio (5 vs. 6)

Revision 62012-02-17 - RichardStDenis

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="InternalPages"
Paper: Search for Lepton Flavor Violation in the emu Continuum
Line: 80 to 80
  I agree with Adrian on the JHEP references, I don't know however if the paper is following some established ATLAS convention.
Added:
>
>
Rick St. Denis' Comments

o p1 line 6:
I thought LPV is a general feature of GUT models, an even more convincing
extension. Not sure how to get a ref.
o p1 line 33:
Why is the top squark taken to be the lightest up type squark? Is it because
limits are set lowest? I assume b squark is more massvive. So I agree with James on this.
o line 35, page 3: Standard ATLAS tools needs a ref or description.
o Fig 2: dont understand the "total background". Signal hard to see
at all on dphi and nJet plot. The preselection tells one that
the top is understood but the final selection has no top visible. The issue
is to ensure tha tthe kinmatic distribution of diboson is correct.
Also, the instrumental suffers low statistics and the tails could
be an issue. It does not seem these plots are of any use in the final analysis.
o Fig 3: seems that in the end this is just a counting experiment
and it is hard to see where the kinematic cuts help.

 -- DeepakKar - 2012-02-14

-- AdrianBuzatu - 2012-02-15

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback